Council to seek fast-track legal powers to reduce impact of unauthorised land occupations

Published: Friday 5th October 18

Councillors have approved plans for a scheme that would offer a fast-track solution to limit the impact of unauthorised incursions on public land in the borough.

Last night’s (Thursday’s) community services and open spaces scrutiny committee gave its backing for the council’s lawyers to seek additional legal powers that would be used to bring unlawful land occupations to a swifter conclusion.

As well as speeding up the departure of groups of people from land they have occupied without lawful permission, the new powers would also ensure they could not simply leave one site and move to another adjacent one.

Rubbish dumped on Tooting Common in 2013's major incursion

To achieve this the council is to seek a borough–wide injunction that would apply to all council-owned public open spaces and highways and provide an immediate fast-track route to bring occupations to an end without requiring a magistrates court order.

If the injunction was granted, the council would no longer be required to seek lengthy and time consuming court orders in order to secure evictions.

The 2013 clean up cost to taxpayers was £25.,000

As well as streamlining the eviction process the injunction would prevent unauthorised occupants leaving one site and simply moving to another one nearby – which under the current system of regulation, would mean the whole eviction process having to start again from scratch.

Borough wide injunctions are being increasingly used by councils as a reasonable measure to deal with unauthorised occupations of land under their control. Other London local authorities to already be using these injunctions include Enfield, Sutton, Croydon, Barking & Dagenham and Waltham Forest.

Part of the 134 cubic metres of waste dumped on Tooting Common in 2013

Parks and open spaces spokesman Cllr Steffi Sutters said: “As things stand if there is an unauthorised occupation in a park or open space it can take weeks for the eviction process to be brought to an end. During that time a great deal of environmental damage can be done which ends up costing taxpayers large sums of money to put right.

“Let me be clear, the law applies to everyone. People are not entitled to simply set up camp in a park or common. These green spaces are there for the whole community to enjoy and this is not possible if people have occupied parts of that land and essentially restricted it for their own unauthorised use.

Bedford Wood, Tooting Common 2013

“We have seen that in other parts of London these injunctions have proved effective in limiting the impact of these occupations, which is why we will now pursue this matter though the courts.”

The last major land occupation took place on Tooting Common in 2013, where 134 cubic metres of rubbish was dumped which cost taxpayers £25,000 to clear up. Since then there have been 28 other incursions on council owned land in the borough.

 Make and view comments on this article



(This is only present to check if you a real person)



(Required)



(Required but not displayed on site)



(Required but not displayed with your comment. Used to help prevent spam.)



(Required)

 
(You can unsubscribe at any time)

  (Required)

 

You must carefully read and then agree to the Terms and Conditions before accessing the message board and posting a comment. If you do not wish to be bound by these Terms and Conditions, you may not access or use the message board.

If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us at press@wandsworth.gov.uk.

Recent comments

Am in total agreement with Mr. Muir. The Council needs to look at its own record on this one.
susan lofthouse

6 October 2018

If granted will the injunction also be used to evict incursions on PUBLIC LAND which have been UNLAWFULLY authorised by the council? Are the lawyers engaged by WBC to seek these powers the same ones who acted for them when they recently tried, unsuccessfully, to define a private nursery as a “facility for public recreation” in the High Court? (at a cost of £80,000 to Wandsworth residents). And the same lawyers who were happy to act again for WBC when, unsuccessfully, trying to overturn the judgment in the Court of Appeal? (cost tbc pending overdue FOI response). Same ones who unsuccessfully applied for Permission to Appeal the unanimous verdict of 3 Appeal Court judges at the Supreme Court (!) in the same Judicial Review? Just asking.
Alexander Muir

6 October 2018

Most of the rubbish dumped on the common is from rogue builders and waste collectors. Let's solve the problem by having a borough wide injunction to prevent residents doing building work. I hope the same outrage at this idea applies to this injunction.
Jo

5 October 2018

I should have said "nigh on insulting" terminology. I hope he is now suitably ashamed of himself.
susan lofthouse

5 October 2018

At last night's meeting, at least one councillor used terminology to discuss Travellers, two of whom were in the room,and had come, as members of the respected Travellers' Community, to put their case. They are not illiterate; yes, they do know how to use social media. Those people whom you see begging are not genuine Travellers, and should not be classed as such/
susan lofthouse

5 October 2018

WHAT ABOUT DOING SOMETHING ABOUT BEGGERS ON THE STREETS a WELL FED HEALTHY LOOKING MAN BEGGERS FOR MONEY TO BUY FOOD
William Wong

5 October 2018

Please fast track them out of Wandsworth as quickly as possible although they will probably find somewhere else to infest and spoil with their antisocial and totally inconsiderate behaviour.
James

5 October 2018

I would like to see the council being able to act to remove people from living permanently on street benches which are provides for the use of the general community. The two Somalis (mother and son I believe) have now been resident on one of the benches outside Tooting Library for over two years. Previously they occupied a bench outside T K MAXX. Where did they come from and are they intending to stay there forever? Apparently they have turned down all offers of assistance. I feel sure that decades ago they would have been removed.
GEORGE LOBLEY

5 October 2018